Has the F1 Fanbase Become More Toxic? We Analysed 100M Fan Conversations to Find Out

Has the F1 Fanbase Become More Toxic? We Analysed 100M Fan Conversations to Find Out

Is Formula 1's Fanbase Really Becoming More Toxic? We Analysed 100 Million Fan Conversations to Find Out

The definitive data-driven analysis of Formula 1 fan behaviour from 2016-2024 using advanced social media intelligence

Show Image

{width="6.267716535433071in" height="3.5in"}

Table of Contents

Are F1 fans really becoming more toxic? {#the-surprising-truth}

Here's what everyone's been asking: Has Formula 1's online community become a toxic wasteland of keyboard warriors and tribal warfare?

Here's what our data actually shows: It's complicated, and the reality might surprise you.

We've spent the last decade quietly building something rather special at Buzz Radar—a comprehensive database of over 100 million Formula 1 conversations from across the internet. Using our social intelligence platform combined with proper human expertise (because algorithms alone don't tell the whole story), we've uncovered some fascinating insights about how F1 fans really behave online.

The headline numbers:

  • Negative interactions rose from 8% in 2016 to 20% in 2024
  • But positive conversations nearly doubled from 23% to 40%
  • That's two positive comments for every negative one
  • The 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix remains the most toxic moment in F1 social media history

The bottom line: Whilst F1 fan toxicity has increased in absolute terms, positive engagement has grown twice as fast. The fanbase isn't becoming more toxic—it's becoming more passionate, and that passion cuts both ways.

What's really happening in F1's online community {#whats-really-happening}

If you spend any time on Formula 1 Twitter (sorry, X), Reddit, or Instagram, you've probably noticed things can get heated. The perception that F1 fans are becoming increasingly toxic has become almost gospel truth. But here's where it gets interesting.

Our analysis of those 100+ million conversations paints a rather different picture. Yes,

negative interactions have more than doubled from 8% to 20% between 2016 and 2024. That's not brilliant news. But here's the kicker—positive conversations have absolutely exploded from 23% to 40% over the same period.

What this actually means: For every person criticising Max Verstappen or defending Lewis Hamilton with righteous fury, there are two others having genuinely positive conversations about the sport they love.

The raw numbers tell a story of a fanbase that's not becoming more toxic, but more engaged overall. The passionate conversations that make F1 special haven't disappeared—they've just multiplied, and with them, the inevitable disagreements that come when people care deeply about something.

The six things that make F1 fans lose their minds {#six-things-that-trigger-toxicity}

When Max Verstappen recently called for better systems to tackle online abuse, and Carlos Sainz urged the media to help combat toxicity through more balanced reporting, they weren't imagining things. There are real issues brewing. Our data analysis identified exactly what pushes F1 fans over the edge:

The Toxicity League Table (2024):

  1. Team and driver rivalries (32%)
  2. Controversial race incidents (28%)
  3. Rule and technical regulation changes (18%)
  4. Accusations of bias (17%)
  5. Nationalistic sentiment (4%)
  6. Environmental concerns (1%)

The gold standard for toxicity remains the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, which generated over 100,000 negative interactions in our dataset. Three years later, mention "Masi" or "safety car" in the wrong context and you can still start a riot.

Old school vs new school: the great F1 culture clash {#old-school-vs-new-school}

Formula 1's explosive growth has created two distinct tribes of fans, and they don't always get along brilliantly.

The traditional guard

  • Demographics: Predominantly men aged 35+
  • Hangouts: Twitter/X and Reddit (the serious corners)
  • How they discovered F1: Usually through their family
  • Drive to Survive opinion: "It's not real F1"
  • What they care about: Sector times, technical regulations, and why the 2004 cars were simply better

The new wave

  • Demographics: Younger, more diverse, higher proportion of women
  • Hangouts: Everywhere—TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, plus the traditional spots
  • How they discovered F1: Often through Drive to Survive or social media
  • Drive to Survive opinion: "Best thing that happened to F1"
  • What they care about: Driver personalities, team dynamics, and yes, the drama

The tension is real: The phrase "typical Drive to Survive fan" appeared over 50,000 times in our 2024 dataset alone. Sometimes it's said fondly, sometimes... not so much.

This cultural divide often creates unnecessary friction. Traditional fans worry about F1 losing its technical soul, whilst newer fans wonder why everyone's so uptight about having a bit of fun with the sport they love.

Why it feels worse than it actually is {#why-it-feels-worse}

If the numbers show things are actually improving, why does it feel like F1 social media is becoming increasingly toxic? It turns out there are some perfectly logical explanations:

The Algorithm Problem: Social media platforms make money from engagement, and unfortunately, controversial content gets people clicking, commenting, and sharing. That brilliant technical analysis post gets 50 likes, but the hot take about why [insert driver name] is overrated goes viral. The algorithms aren't neutral—they're actively promoting the spicy content.

The Moderation Situation: Platform moderation has become rather... relaxed since 2022. Content that might once have been filtered or flagged now stays up longer, meaning toxic interactions remain visible and continue generating responses.

Basic Human Psychology: We're hardwired to notice negative things more than positive ones. It's called negativity bias, and it means that one nasty comment about your favourite driver sticks in your memory longer than ten positive ones.

The Speed of Controversy: Bad news travels fast, and in F1 social media, controversial takes spread roughly three times faster than positive content. A single dodgy stewarding decision can generate thousands of angry posts within hours, whilst positive stories about driver charity work might take days to gain traction.

Warning signs: what could go wrong next

Despite the generally improving trajectory, we've spotted some potential storm clouds on the horizon using predictive modelling based on what happened in other motorsports.

The IndyCar Warning: When Argentine driver Agustín Canapino was involved in an incident with Théo Pourchaire at Detroit, negative sentiment spiked by 224% above normal levels. What followed were coordinated social media attacks that made regular F1 fan arguments look like polite disagreements over tea.

The F1 Risk: Franco Colapinto's potential entry to Formula 1 in 2025/26 could trigger similar patterns. Our modelling suggests F1 could see a 10-30% increase in toxic interactions over the next 36 months if regional fanbase dynamics spiral in similar ways.

Why this matters: Formula 1's audience is significantly larger than IndyCar's, and current platform moderation is less robust than it was during previous controversies. The scale and intensity of potential regional fanbase conflicts could be unprecedented.

As our CEO Patrick Charlton puts it: "Whilst overall fan engagement is increasingly positive, we've identified concerning patterns that could rapidly shift this balance in the next 18 months."

How to fix the problems before they get worse {#how-to-fix-problems}

The good news is that these issues are entirely fixable with the right approach. Here's what needs to happen:

For F1 Teams and the Sport:

  • Get ahead of controversial incidents with rapid, clear communication
  • Amplify positive fan stories to counter the algorithm bias towards negativity
  • Create proper community guidelines and actually enforce them consistently
  • Launch fan education programmes about respectful engagement (sounds boring, but it works)

For Social Media Platforms:

  • Bring back proper content moderation for motorsport communities
  • Adjust algorithms to stop amplifying every controversial take
  • Give users better tools to report coordinated harassment
  • Implement early warning systems for when things are about to kick off

For Media and Content Creators:

  • Stop sensationalising every minor controversy for clicks
  • Highlight the brilliant, positive aspects of F1 fan communities
  • Bridge the gap between traditional and new fan perspectives
  • Report the data-driven reality, not just the loudest voices

Formula 1 has one of the most passionate, knowledgeable, and generally decent fanbases in sport. Yes, things can get heated, but that's because people genuinely care. With the right approach, we can keep the passion whilst ditching the toxicity.

The FIA's Response: Formula 1's governing body has taken these concerns seriously, with FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem launching comprehensive initiatives to combat online abuse, including partnerships with AI companies and new regulations targeting misconduct that incites fan harassment.

Get the complete analysis {#get-complete-analysis}

Want the full deep dive? Our comprehensive Formula 1 fan behaviour report includes:

  • Detailed platform breakdowns showing how fans behave differently on Twitter vs TikTok vs Reddit
  • Predictive modelling for the next three years of F1 fan trends
  • Regional analysis comparing fan behaviour across different countries
  • Actionable recommendations for teams, sponsors, and media

Download the Complete Report

More F1 audience insights {#more-f1-insights}

This toxicity analysis is part three of our ongoing F1 research series. Catch up on our previous deep dives:

About Buzz Radar

We help the world's leading motorsport teams and sponsors understand their audiences properly. Not just surface-level demographics, but the deep insights that help create genuine connections with fans. Our social intelligence platform combines advanced AI with proper human expertise because, let's face it, algorithms alone don't understand why someone might get emotional about a DRS zone adjustment.

Learn more about our motorsport solutions

Research Methodology: This analysis used our proprietary social intelligence platform to examine over 100 million Formula 1 conversations from 2016-2024 across major platforms including Twitter/X, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. We combined natural language processing with expert human analysis because context matters, especially when you're trying to understand why F1 fans feel so passionately about their sport.

Data Sources: Our analysis covered conversations from major social media platforms, official F1 forums, fan communities, and news article comments. All data was anonymised and processed in compliance with data protection regulations.

Patrick Charlton Published on February 12, 2025 2:27 pm

Back to Blog