Is a social media backlash still the disaster it once was?

A social media firestorm has long been the nightmare that keeps CMOs and marketing managers awake at night. We’ve all seen those terrifying moments over the years when a viral video has toppled a brand’s reputation overnight. Those days aren’t entirely behind us, but the landscape of social media crises has shifted dramatically. We’ve come a long way from the “Wild West” days of early social platforms, and the paradigm for brand reputation management has definitely shifted. But how far? Is the social media firestorm still a very real danger for a brand?

Way back in 2009, with what we were calling “Web 2.0” in its infancy, United Airlines found itself in the crosshairs of public outrage when musician Dave Carroll’s guitar was damaged during a flight. His response was a catchy YouTube song aptly titled ‘United Breaks Guitars’. The video went viral, costing the airline millions in stock value and cementing its reputation for poor customer service. It was a wake-up call for brands worldwide: you ignore social media at your peril.

Fifteen years later, with social media an entrenched part of our lives and our businesses, the game has certainly changed. Social media crises haven’t disappeared, but they’ve evolved in ways that demand a more nuanced approach from brands. Where once a crisis might have stemmed from a single, clear-cut issue, today’s social media firestorms often arise from a complex interplay of societal concerns, brand values, and public perception. The Balenciaga controversy of late 2022 is a good example — the luxury fashion brand faced severe backlash over an advertising campaign featuring children holding teddy bears dressed in bondage gear. Unlike United’s straightforward case of customer dissatisfaction, Balenciaga’s crisis was a complex web of issues involving child safety, artistic expression, and corporate responsibility.

That same year, Adidas had to deal with Kanye West, closely tied to the brand at the time, making antisemitic remarks. Adidas found itself walking a tightrope. Cut ties immediately and risk backlash from Ye’s fans? Or wait and face accusations of tolerating hate speech? Their delayed response drew criticism, illustrating how brands now often find themselves in no-win situations.

It’s not just global behemoths that face these challenges. In early 2024, dating app Bumble learned this lesson the hard way. Their outdoor campaign featuring the slogan “a vow of celibacy is not the answer” was intended to be cheeky and relatable. Instead, it sparked outrage for seemingly pressuring women into relationships – a particularly tone-deaf move in an era of heightened awareness around women’s rights and autonomy.

What all of these have in common is complexity: today’s social media crises are rarely simple, one-dimensional issues. They’re often intertwined with broader societal conversations, making navigation particularly tricky for brands.

So, are these crises less damaging than their predecessors? Not necessarily. While brands have honed their crisis management skills, the potential for significant reputational and financial damage remains very real. What’s changed is the playing field itself.

First, speed is everything, but so is thoughtfulness. Brands must respond quickly, but knee-jerk reactions can backfire spectacularly. This year, BMW appeared to promise a new car to a TikTok creator complaining about her husband’s broken promise. The problem is they didn’t make good on the promise. It exposed the dangers of reactive social media engagement without proper consideration.

Second, complexity is the norm. Modern crises rarely have a single cause or straightforward solution. They often involve intersecting issues of ethics, politics, and social responsibility.Third, the court of public opinion is always in session. Social media has given everyone a voice, and brands must navigate a cacophony of perspectives. This was evident in the backlash Apple faced this year for the iPad Pro ad that literally crushed creative tools, alienating the very creatives who have long been the brand’s strongest advocates.Lastly, minor issues can snowball. It’s not just big crises that matter. Small missteps, like Target’s 2024 Black History Month magnet kit that misidentified several Civil Rights leaders, can erode trust over time and spark significant backlash.

It means that the ability to anticipate and mitigate crises before they explode has become crucial. This is where social listening and sentiment analysis come into their own. Brands that keep their finger on the pulse of public sentiment can identify potential issues early, gauge the temperature of different audience segments, and craft responses that resonate authentically with their audience.

But it’s not just about averting disaster. Ongoing social listening allows brands to address minor issues promptly, preventing the cumulative damage that can be just as harmful as a major crisis. It’s about being proactive rather than reactive, understanding the nuances of public opinion before they coalesce into a full-blown crisis.

As we’ve seen, social media crises have evolved from simple, devastating blows to complex, multifaceted challenges. Brands can no longer rely on a one-size-fits-all crisis management playbook. Instead, success in this new era requires constant vigilance, agile response teams empowered to make quick, informed decisions, and a deep understanding of the brand’s place in broader societal conversations.

The most successful brands view social media not just as a potential minefield, but as a powerful tool for strengthening relationships with their audience. By listening closely, responding thoughtfully, and engaging authentically, brands can build resilience in the face of potential crises.

It’s not about weathering a single storm, but about learning to navigate an ever-changing sea. The brands that thrive will be those that embrace this complexity, staying attuned to the currents of public sentiment and steering a course that’s true to their values.

The era of the simple, catastrophic social media crisis may be behind us. But in its place, we face a more nuanced, ongoing challenge – one that requires constant attention, deep understanding, and a willingness to evolve. In this new world, brands have the opportunity not just to survive crises, but to build deeper, more meaningful connections with their audiences. After all, in the realm of social media, it’s not the absence of storms that defines success, but the skill with which we navigate them.

Blog Posts

Category: SOCIAL LISTENING AND PUBLIC SENTIMENT

Is a social media backlash still the disaster it once was?